Broken clocks, as they say.

Not error. Terror. They missed the T.

If they had cut about 45 minutes of useless chase scenes, it would have been great. There was just so much untrimmed fat on that film.

My wife tells me I have “David Lynch taste in music,” and while that sounds like a compliment to me, she does not mean it to be one.

Tiga’s Bugatti

Mother Mother’s Hayloft

Kate Bush’s Suspended in Gaffa

CocoRosie’s Lemonade

CocoRosie’s Werewolf

Dresden Dolls’ Coin-Operated Boy

Austra’s The Beat and the Pulse

Peaches’ Lovertits

Poppy’s Concrete

Aphex Twin’s Windowlicker

Burn the witch! openSUSE is the messiah.

The man, who supported President Donald Trump though he can’t vote, says he “feels differently” now and blames the administration for his immigration plight.

“No, don’t hurt me, hurt those other people!”

…if I wrote comments with those types of people in mind, I’d never be able to say anything worthwhile.

Pish-posh! Proofreading can help with that as can thinking about your audience. It’s certainly a skill that needs to be developed, but you have plenty of interesting points to make and only have to tweak the presentation. For example, you could preface your post with a statement of intent.

“Look, I’m not defending the practice but…” would do.

For example, I was raised evangelical and am now a deconstructed atheist. I still interject regularly on scriptural topics that people frequently get wrong, which can result in others assuming I am an advocate. I am not, so I try to preface those kinds of statements with qualifiers.

I know you are trying to be informative and nothing you said is wrong, but that opening sentence makes it sound like you are defending the practice of polygraphy which is pseudoscientific, inaccurate, and unethical. I have a feeling most downvoters never got past that first sentence.

Best he can do is cut funding for health care to fund a new military industrial complex.

Here’s a reminder of how to interact with police.

http://youtu.be/uqo5RYOp4nQ

Using the term “politically correct” as a pejorative is a dog whistle. It is not literally political but communicates a right wing frustration over social consequences when they engage in overt racist, sexist, hateful, bigoted, or exclusionary speech or behavior. In more recent parlance it has been largely supplanted by a pejorative usage of “woke.”

Any AI that is trained on the internet – which is ostensibly all of them – will provide a broad reflection of the public zeitgeist. Since the prompt specified “politically incorrect” as a positive attribute its generated text reflected the training data where “politically incorrect” was presented as a positive trait. Since we know that it’s a dog whistle, by having lived through decades of it’s use in mass media and online, it comes as no surprise that an AI instructed to ape that behavior has done exactly what it was told.

Lovely. Let me pencil “zombie apocalypse” back onto my 2026 BINGO card.

deleted by creator

So what literally everyone already knew.

“‘Not politically correct’ means ‘deliberately racist’”

All of them. It was their founding mandate. It’s simply operating more openly and at unimaginable scale this year.

Are recalls a thing there? Because that Paterson guy needs to be recalled.

Edit: He’s not even governor. He served a partial term in 15 years ago and wasn’t even elected. This is madness.

Tailscale is Canadian.

There is no way. If identity is involved in any way, shape, or form it is a major privacy and security risk. Meta supports it only because it shifts responsibility and liability off themselves. In other words, it benefits them financially. Endangering the public for profit is their whole M.O.

Apple is being sued because they announced and demonstrated all of these AI features and then never delivered. They are actually doing good work in the AI field, including a recent paper that demonstrates that AI/LLM technology is incapable of reasoning, and any apparent logic seen in current approaches is simply an illusion. It’s not that they “aren’t moving fast enough”, it’s that they intentionally lied about their capabilities and timelines.

When America sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with them. They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists, and some, I assume, are good people.

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7764650-when-mexico-sends-its-people-they-re-not-sending-their-best